My RSS Feeds
StatCounter
Was WTC 7 a Dud?
So, for those who agree that WTC 7 was indeed brought down with a preplanted explosives system — the last act in a "psy-op" that included the destruction of the entire World Trade Center complex on 9/11 — then the next question becomes: Why did the conspirators wait until the end of the day to do it? What possible reason would they have to keep WTC 7 up all day long? In the four years or so since the unofficial citizens investigation into 9/11 began, no one has offered any sensible answers to this question. But the list of compelling reasons why waiting seven hours after the attacks to bring Building 7 down was not a good idea is long and hard to ignore.If keeping WTC 7 up for so long after the attacks has proven so threatening to the plot's success and its subsequent coverup, why would the plotters have done it? Only two possibilities logically present themselves; 1) there was some absolutely critical but, as yet, undetermined reason to keep the building intact for so long, or 2) it wasn't originally meant to come down when it did. Since absolutely no compelling case has been made for the former possibility, circumstances appear to support the latter. Is it possible that WTC 7's explosive system didn't operate as planned, a disastrous glitch in an otherwise well conceived plan? The following is a presentation of points that appear to support this theory, one that paints a dramatically different picture of what theorists previously thought had occurred throughout the day on 9/11.
Was WTC 7 a Dud?
Jeremy Baker, Darkprints, July 2005
I read somewhere that WTC7 was the "control center" for the CIA and all
involved, and I am not referring to the "bunker" that the Mayor had
on one of the floors with glass that could withstand winds of 165 mph...So
maybe "they" had to keep this building standing until the entire operation
was finished...And I might add, that the reason the 2nd WTC building went
down first, even though most of the fuel from the plane was lost outside of
the building during the crash, was because "they" had to set off the "C-4"
charges placed on each floor when the fire went out in this building in
order for the collapse to look real...But beware, Bush wants to remain in
office even after his term is up, and he will if he declares "Marshall Law"
after one of those "suitcase atomic bombs" goes off that he is sure to set
off himself. My guess is he will set one off when he knows the game is up
and the public is getting too wise to what really happened concerning
9/11...It was almost Charleston that was going to be nuked, but the General
in charge would not go along with Bush's plan, so Bush had him arrested on
some phony sex charge.
"Why would the killers destroy WTC-7, especially since a collapse would
arouse suspicion in some quarters? A logical if unproven theory is that the
perpetrators used Mayor Giuliani’s sealed OEM "bunker" on the 23d story of
WTC-7 to conduct the twin tower implosions and then destroyed the building
and evidence to cover up their crimes, just as a murderer might set his
victim’s dwelling ablaze to cover up the crime (one in four fires is
arson). Giuliani’s "undisclosed secret location" was perfect because it had
been evacuated by 9:45 a.m. on 9/11, it enabled unmolested work, provided a
ringside seat, was bullet- and bomb-resistant, had its own secure air and
water supply, and could withstand winds of 160 mph, necessary protection
from the wind blasts generated by collapsing skyscrapers.".....So wrote
Morgan Reynolds, who was the chief economist for the US Dept. of Labor
during 2001-2002 under Bush. This quote is from his article, "Why Did Trade
Center Skyscrapers Collapse? This article can be read in its entirety at,
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
"Why would the killers destroy WTC-7, especially since a collapse would
arouse suspicion in some quarters? A logical if unproven theory is that the
perpetrators used Mayor Giuliani’s sealed OEM "bunker" on the 23d story of
WTC-7 to conduct the twin tower implosions and then destroyed the building
and evidence to cover up their crimes, just as a murderer might set his
victim’s dwelling ablaze to cover up the crime (one in four fires is
arson). Giuliani’s "undisclosed secret location" was perfect because it had
been evacuated by 9:45 a.m. on 9/11, it enabled unmolested work, provided a
ringside seat, was bullet- and bomb-resistant, had its own secure air and
water supply, and could withstand winds of 160 mph, necessary protection
from the wind blasts generated by collapsing skyscrapers.".....So wrote
Morgan Reynolds, who was the chief economist for the US Dept. of Labor
during 2001-2002 under Bush. This quote is from his article, "Why Did Trade
Center Skyscrapers Collapse? This article can be read in its entirety at,
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html