free web page hit counter
Building a Pyramid

Introduction


Boris Epstein's Journal

Current news links


This journal is here to promote free thinking in hopes of creating a more tolerable world for all. It can be most reliably read in its entirety via the LinkBlog. It contains articles by multiple contributors, including yours truly, as well as links to many external webpages.

Feel free to e-mail me for more info at borepstein@gmail.com.

Mailing List

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Donations

News Sites - Portlet


News Sites

Technorati Profile


Technorati Search

Technorati search

My Top Tags

                                       

My RSS Feeds








Blog Directories

Blog Catalogs
-----------------
Blogarama
-----------------
Blog Directory
Add Your Blog
-----------------
Blog Universe
-----------------

StatCounter

Pyramid stats

Opposition to Michigan ‘Shoot-to-Kill’ Bill Grows

posted Wednesday, 22 February 2006
According to information provided by the National Rifle Association, the proposed law in Michigan is similar to one already enacted in Florida last year. Lawmakers in Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Oklahoma and South Dakota are considering similar bills. Such laws are often referred to as "shoot first" or "shoot-to-kill" by gun-control groups, and as "stand-your-ground" or "castle doctrine" by proponents.

The bills generally shield gun owners who shoot trespassers by writing into law the assumption that anyone breaking into a residence means bodily harm to the occupants. The bills also allow people to match "force with force" anywhere in public places, granting gun owners the right to shoot anyone they believe threatens their life or someone else’s life.

"These bills immediately deputize anyone with a weapon to take on a criminal in potentially crowded public settings," the gun-control advocate Brady Campaign said. "It’s extraordinarily ill-advised and irresponsible."


Opposition to Michigan ‘Shoot-to-Kill’ Bill Grows
NewStandard, February 22, 2006

While personally I value human life greatly I am also a firm believer in everybody's right to self defense. And as such I support the notion that anyone whose life is theatened by a violent criminal has a rigth to self defense. I would also have to disagre with Brady Campaign becasue the law does not require citizens to use force and stop criminals; it does not deputize them, merely gives them a legal right to excercise one of their key natural rights - that to protect oneself from whoever threatens one's life.

tags: