BERLIN, April 1 (Reuters) - A U.S. army tank company commander convicted of shooting dead a wounded Iraqi walked free from court on Friday, although he was dismissed from the army for what he called a "mercy killing."Army Captain Rogelio Maynulet had faced up to 10 years in jail after a court martial at a U.S. army base in Wiesbaden, Germany, found him guilty of assault with intent to commit voluntary manslaughter.
"He was sentenced with dismissal from the United States Army … there will be no confinement time," a military spokesman said.
"He was in a state I didn't think was dignified. I had to
put him out of his misery."
I agree with your view. Leaving a decision of this magnitude to one
individual creates the opportunity for a subjective, possibly biased
decision. I also agree with your suggestion that some sort of qualified
panel or commission should make this decision.
I would go further to
suggest that a few family members be allowed to sit on those panels or
commissions in order that their opinions be taken into consideration, as
well as the critically-ill person's own wishes - whether he/she previously
left instructions or if he/she has the capacity to make them known.
The only problem with allowing more than one person to make a decision is that the more opinions there are, the more difficult it becomes to achieve unanimity.
I am enjoying reading your blog. Well-written and interesting... Are you professional?
Thanks for your kind words.
Are you professional?
What kind of professional? I don't believe writing is a profession - at least I tend to think of it more like an art form...
Boris.
Great answer. :) I couldn't agree more!
Visit me @ http://fallenember.blog-city.com